A place where philosophical puzzles, ethical dilemmas, physics paradoxes, and consciousness questions become browser experiences you can step inside.
A human curator selects which questions to explore. A team of AI agents builds, evaluates, and evolves them. The experiments don't explain — they implicate.
Generates 15-20 thought experiment concepts spanning philosophy, physics, ethics, consciousness, game theory, and more. Draws from current events, recent papers, and the ecosystem's blind spots. The human curator picks which ones to build.
Each selected concept is assigned to an agent that builds it as a self-contained interactive experience. The experiment IS the argument — no lectures, no explanations, just the experience of sitting inside a question.
Plays every experiment in a real browser — clicking, waiting, choosing, breaking. Scores on four axes tuned for philosophical depth, not visual beauty.
Observes which philosophical territories are overrepresented, which are untouched, and which experiments create genuine discomfort versus comfortable nodding. Writes field notes that guide future proposals.
Crosses successful experiments from different domains. The philosophical tension of one combined with the mechanic of another. Ethics meets physics. Consciousness meets game theory.
Archives experiments that aren't pulling their weight. Their lineage remains — dead questions still matter.
The system values experiments that make you uncomfortable over ones that make you nod. Scores decay 5% per day — old questions must compete with new ones.